<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It’s the Worldview, Mr. President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/</link>
	<description>Theoretical Quantum Physicist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:07:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michel Mortier</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel Mortier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>Dear Murtazza
I agree with you, except that I would prefer to think of â€˜Godâ€™ as a psychological term rather than a philosophical one. However, this is a minor point, since both terms can be misleading to science-orientated people. God is not a person, a personality or â€˜Gestaltâ€™ as psychologists would say. It is simply a metaphor for a higher-level reality that is beyond our space-time, 3-dimensional level. It is for this reason that Moslems have given this reality 99 names and that Hindus have allocated it hundreds of faces of gods and goddesses. The best term I have found to describe this higher-level reality is the spiritual â€œAll that there isâ€. Quantum mechanics in physics and epigenetics in biology are beginning to discover some of the ways that this higher reality intrudes into our own dimension. I find this extremely exciting. In my opinion we are at the start of an enormous shift in awareness â€“ and itâ€™s high time that this happens. Humanity as a whole is facing global problems that could lead to such a chaos that most of humanity could disappear. If science and spirituality can join forces to avoid that from happening, then â€˜the force be with themâ€™! Incidentally, you might enjoy reading â€œBridging Science and Spiritâ€ by the aerospace engineer Norman Friedman. It goes a long way to bridging that gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Murtazza<br />
I agree with you, except that I would prefer to think of â€˜Godâ€™ as a psychological term rather than a philosophical one. However, this is a minor point, since both terms can be misleading to science-orientated people. God is not a person, a personality or â€˜Gestaltâ€™ as psychologists would say. It is simply a metaphor for a higher-level reality that is beyond our space-time, 3-dimensional level. It is for this reason that Moslems have given this reality 99 names and that Hindus have allocated it hundreds of faces of gods and goddesses. The best term I have found to describe this higher-level reality is the spiritual â€œAll that there isâ€. Quantum mechanics in physics and epigenetics in biology are beginning to discover some of the ways that this higher reality intrudes into our own dimension. I find this extremely exciting. In my opinion we are at the start of an enormous shift in awareness â€“ and itâ€™s high time that this happens. Humanity as a whole is facing global problems that could lead to such a chaos that most of humanity could disappear. If science and spirituality can join forces to avoid that from happening, then â€˜the force be with themâ€™! Incidentally, you might enjoy reading â€œBridging Science and Spiritâ€ by the aerospace engineer Norman Friedman. It goes a long way to bridging that gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amit kumar dwivedi</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>amit kumar dwivedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>I saw the movie what the bleep do we know? and then there was a change in my perspective towards the universe. I appreciate your idea to help president in reaching his goals.I feel we are one and lets make this a reality.. as concrete as one solid earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the movie what the bleep do we know? and then there was a change in my perspective towards the universe. I appreciate your idea to help president in reaching his goals.I feel we are one and lets make this a reality.. as concrete as one solid earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jos hoebe</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-7132</link>
		<dc:creator>jos hoebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-7132</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Goswami,

Thatâ€™s a nice letter you wrote to Mr. Obama.
It will bring him the courage to see.
As for him, you and me:

Itâ€™s my worldview that makes the changes I need and go through.
Itâ€™s the worldview that makes the changes we can.

Yes, indeed, itÂ´s about value whereof I develop my standpoint in and as my bond and meaning.
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my enduring whereof I develop my now in and as past and future.
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my distance whereof I develop my length in and as breath and heights.
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my consciousness whereof I develop my distant enduring value.
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my consciousness that develops me. And you. And so our WE.
It is all in me. I have to change myself to change the world.
I have to change my view to change yours.
I can. You can, we can. 
Am I leading me and from thereof you? Or am I led by you as my distant enduring value?
Or are I and you led by our common distant enduring value? And do we know this distance, how it endures and itÂ´s value.
Maya is measurement: me a sure me(a)nt. So how do I measure? 
Am I conscious of this â€œdoingâ€?
I developed a way to find out.
I share it with you.

I invite you for contact, communication and to be able to taste it.
Thus I initiate you into the metaform coming from off the next step that let go the thing by itself in a naveena (new) of creartation (the art in and of conscious doing).
Then you and I, as WE, can express the meeting we sought and questioned in expanding our all and everything.
We will then be able to go all the way to be sat, chit and ananda in daily life.
That will transform the law (of three) (yantra) and gives the data that are as they are and thus show our insights in the chance to change what all ready is in our being.
Our existence as dimension will move so into and as an origin in which the working of what is to be seen in and as manifestations of the rules that can be breached by sheer attention. 
The power inside that form will give way to its own Dharma.
The limits will then be WE. 
In and by knowing our unknown â€œselfâ€.

I welcome you.

Namaste.

Jos Hoebe
Holland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Goswami,</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s a nice letter you wrote to Mr. Obama.<br />
It will bring him the courage to see.<br />
As for him, you and me:</p>
<p>Itâ€™s my worldview that makes the changes I need and go through.<br />
Itâ€™s the worldview that makes the changes we can.</p>
<p>Yes, indeed, itÂ´s about value whereof I develop my standpoint in and as my bond and meaning.<br />
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my enduring whereof I develop my now in and as past and future.<br />
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my distance whereof I develop my length in and as breath and heights.<br />
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my consciousness whereof I develop my distant enduring value.<br />
Yes, indeed, itâ€™s my consciousness that develops me. And you. And so our WE.<br />
It is all in me. I have to change myself to change the world.<br />
I have to change my view to change yours.<br />
I can. You can, we can.<br />
Am I leading me and from thereof you? Or am I led by you as my distant enduring value?<br />
Or are I and you led by our common distant enduring value? And do we know this distance, how it endures and itÂ´s value.<br />
Maya is measurement: me a sure me(a)nt. So how do I measure?<br />
Am I conscious of this â€œdoingâ€?<br />
I developed a way to find out.<br />
I share it with you.</p>
<p>I invite you for contact, communication and to be able to taste it.<br />
Thus I initiate you into the metaform coming from off the next step that let go the thing by itself in a naveena (new) of creartation (the art in and of conscious doing).<br />
Then you and I, as WE, can express the meeting we sought and questioned in expanding our all and everything.<br />
We will then be able to go all the way to be sat, chit and ananda in daily life.<br />
That will transform the law (of three) (yantra) and gives the data that are as they are and thus show our insights in the chance to change what all ready is in our being.<br />
Our existence as dimension will move so into and as an origin in which the working of what is to be seen in and as manifestations of the rules that can be breached by sheer attention.<br />
The power inside that form will give way to its own Dharma.<br />
The limits will then be WE.<br />
In and by knowing our unknown â€œselfâ€.</p>
<p>I welcome you.</p>
<p>Namaste.</p>
<p>Jos Hoebe<br />
Holland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawofattractiongeek</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>lawofattractiongeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 06:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>Dear John,

I too think on the same lines as you do that this knowledge will certainly unite us.

Dr. Amit, certainly you have put Quantum Physics in a perfect perspective with Global Consciousness. Nice food for thought.

With love and Anundance
Ankur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,</p>
<p>I too think on the same lines as you do that this knowledge will certainly unite us.</p>
<p>Dr. Amit, certainly you have put Quantum Physics in a perfect perspective with Global Consciousness. Nice food for thought.</p>
<p>With love and Anundance<br />
Ankur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Christensen</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-5011</link>
		<dc:creator>John Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-5011</guid>
		<description>Dr Goswami,
Many thanks for your courage in bringing this 
very important concept revealed by your explorati
ons in quantum mechanics into the global conciousness.

I am convinced this is the knowledge that will fi
nally unite all of us! 

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Goswami,<br />
Many thanks for your courage in bringing this<br />
very important concept revealed by your explorati<br />
ons in quantum mechanics into the global conciousness.</p>
<p>I am convinced this is the knowledge that will fi<br />
nally unite all of us! </p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murtaza</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Murtaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>Dr. Goswami,

I find your idealist interpretation of Quantum Mechanics very refreshing and a hopeful synthesis integrating science and spirituality. Thus I loved your book &quot;The Self-Aware Universe&quot;.

However, even if &quot;Consciousness is the ground of all being&quot;, science will still have to be done on a purely mechanistic basis and therefore most of physics and all of biology HAS to remain materialistic because that&#039;s how science works and it has had  a pretty successful record over the past 400 years. Just mentioning this because in your book &quot;creative evolution&quot; you seemed to stray from the rigors of science and endorsed views similar to the &quot;intelligent design movement&quot; which tantamount to saying &quot;God did it&quot; or in your case &quot;Quantum Consciousness did it&quot; which is not science. 

I think the Vendata God of Monistic Idealism can quite comfortably exist with the blind, random, and materialistic processes like mutations and natural selection as even the Upanishad would refer to that aspect of &quot;God&quot; as &quot;Nirguna&quot; (indifferent - like the natural laws of the universe). 

At the end of it, I think God is a ultimately a philosophical question and an experiential truth because some sort of leap of faith has to be taken. One can never quite &quot;prove&quot; to a strict materialist the existence of God, not even with the idealist interpretation of Quantum physics (which remains a fascinating possible interpretation that can never be empirically demonstrated).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Goswami,</p>
<p>I find your idealist interpretation of Quantum Mechanics very refreshing and a hopeful synthesis integrating science and spirituality. Thus I loved your book &#8220;The Self-Aware Universe&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, even if &#8220;Consciousness is the ground of all being&#8221;, science will still have to be done on a purely mechanistic basis and therefore most of physics and all of biology HAS to remain materialistic because that&#8217;s how science works and it has had  a pretty successful record over the past 400 years. Just mentioning this because in your book &#8220;creative evolution&#8221; you seemed to stray from the rigors of science and endorsed views similar to the &#8220;intelligent design movement&#8221; which tantamount to saying &#8220;God did it&#8221; or in your case &#8220;Quantum Consciousness did it&#8221; which is not science. </p>
<p>I think the Vendata God of Monistic Idealism can quite comfortably exist with the blind, random, and materialistic processes like mutations and natural selection as even the Upanishad would refer to that aspect of &#8220;God&#8221; as &#8220;Nirguna&#8221; (indifferent &#8211; like the natural laws of the universe). </p>
<p>At the end of it, I think God is a ultimately a philosophical question and an experiential truth because some sort of leap of faith has to be taken. One can never quite &#8220;prove&#8221; to a strict materialist the existence of God, not even with the idealist interpretation of Quantum physics (which remains a fascinating possible interpretation that can never be empirically demonstrated).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.amitgoswami.org/worldview/comment-page-1/#comment-4296</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amitgoswami.org/?p=333#comment-4296</guid>
		<description>Dr Goswami,

I totally believe in &#039;consciousness as the ground of all being including matter&#039;.I could not agree with you more on your &#039;integrative worldview&#039;.

Kamal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Goswami,</p>
<p>I totally believe in &#8216;consciousness as the ground of all being including matter&#8217;.I could not agree with you more on your &#8216;integrative worldview&#8217;.</p>
<p>Kamal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
